The Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Gwagwalada Branch, popularly known as the Eagle Bar, Barrister MD Abdulsalam, has condemned the ongoing legal proceedings involving Chronicles Reporters and human rights activist and community organiser, Manasseh B.P., expressing concern over what he described as an attempt to victimise journalists and outspoken voices committed to holding individuals in positions of influence accountable.
Barrister MD Abdulsalam, who spoke to Chronicles Reporters ahead of the next court proceedings tomorrow, maintained that freedom of expression, public accountability and the right of journalists to perform their professional duties without intimidation are essential pillars of a democratic society.
The NBA Gwagwalada chairman argued that reporting issues of public interest and questioning the conduct of influential individuals should not automatically expose journalists and activists to persecution. He stressed that citizens must be allowed to express their opinions and demand accountability without fear of being subjected to processes that could discourage legitimate public-interest reporting.
According to him, the circumstances surrounding the case raise serious concerns about the protection of press freedom and the treatment of individuals who speak out on matters affecting society. He reportedly questioned the need for the proceedings, describing the dispute as one that raises concerns about whether legal processes are being used appropriately or could become instruments for intimidating journalists and activists.
Barrister MD Abdulsalam further assured Chronicles Reporters that he would be present in court to demonstrate solidarity with the defendants and provide legal representation. His position underscores his stated commitment to supporting the defendants as they navigate the legal process and ensuring that their rights are protected.
The NBA chairman’s intervention comes amid growing attention to the case involving Chronicles Reporters, Manasseh B.P., and Abubakar Jubril Giri, also known as Abu Giri, alongside Ezekiel Umar Biko, popularly known as Zezelaga, whom the defendants’ supporters have associated with the dispute. The matter has generated concerns among those who believe that disagreements involving journalistic publications and public commentary should be addressed through lawful procedures without undermining the freedom of the press.
Separately, Barrister Marshal Abubakar, the lead counsel to Manasseh B.P., has criticised the handling of the matter, questioning why the relevant authorities allegedly failed to investigate complaints against Abu Giri and others while his client was allegedly subjected to actions he described as unlawful and intended to victimise a journalist.
Speaking to Chronicles Reporters, Barrister Marshal Abubakar argued that where allegations are brought before the police, the appropriate response should be a thorough, impartial and lawful investigation. He maintained that law enforcement authorities have a responsibility to examine complaints on their merits, establish the relevant facts and ensure that all parties are treated fairly under the law.
The defence counsel expressed concern over the alleged abduction of a journalist and the subsequent legal proceedings involving his client. He argued that allegations of wrongdoing should be investigated in accordance with the law rather than handled in ways that could intimidate journalists or discourage citizens from speaking about matters of public interest.
Barrister Marshal Abubakar further disclosed that appropriate measures were being taken in response to the situation and indicated that additional legal action would be pursued where necessary. He expressed confidence that the law would take its course, stressing that the defence would continue to explore the available legal remedies in challenging actions it considers unlawful.
His comments place renewed focus on the responsibilities of the police and other relevant authorities to investigate complaints fairly, protect citizens’ rights and ensure that the justice system is not used to intimidate individuals exercising their lawful rights.
The two lawyers, while speaking from their respective positions, have drawn attention to different aspects of the dispute. Barrister MD Abdulsalam, as chairman of the NBA Gwagwalada Branch, has expressed solidarity with the defendants and pledged to appear in court, while Barrister Marshal Abubakar, as Manasseh B.P.’s lead counsel, has focused on the legal response to the allegations and the possibility of further proceedings.
Their interventions have intensified public interest in the case, particularly among those concerned about the relationship between journalism, public accountability and the administration of justice.
The case involving Manasseh B.P. is scheduled to come up on Monday, October 19, 2026, with attention focused on the next stage of the proceedings. The hearing is expected to provide further clarity on the direction of the matter and the procedural steps that may follow.
As the court date approaches, the central issues remain the circumstances surrounding the dispute, the allegations raised by the parties and the extent to which the relevant authorities have complied with the law. The defence has indicated that it intends to pursue available legal options, while the proceedings will provide an opportunity for the parties to present their respective positions before the court.
For Chronicles Reporters, the case represents a wider debate about the ability of journalists and human rights advocates to scrutinise public affairs without fear of intimidation. The newspaper maintains that public officials and influential individuals should be open to legitimate questions and criticism, while recognising that all parties are entitled to seek legal remedies where they believe their rights have been violated.
The unfolding proceedings also serve as a reminder that allegations, counterclaims and disputes must be resolved through evidence, due process and the independent determination of the court. No party should be presumed guilty merely because allegations have been made, and every defendant is entitled to a fair hearing in accordance with the law.
With Barrister MD Abdulsalam pledging to stand with the defendants and Barrister Marshal Abubakar promising further legal action where necessary, all eyes are now on the court as the matter comes up on October 19.
The next hearing will be closely watched by journalists, legal practitioners, activists and other observers concerned about press freedom, accountability and the protection of fundamental rights in Nigeria.